| Regions:

Top
See notes below. Report produced at UCB College of Natural
Resources.
Top
Notes below explain terms used
and aspects of data treatment in producing the reports.
Wages Section
Each type of job is briefly defined on the survey
form to facilitate reporting wage rates relative to similar work,
but some of the pay variation within a given job is attributable
to differences across firms in the duties for which people with
the same title are responsible. Pay for eight job titles could be
reported per hour, per month, or both. The tables in this report
of findings include columns showing the overall average, the average
low and high, and the absolute low and high wages reported for each
job by respondents in the subgroup specified at top of the page
(by crop for each association, and by crop, region, and size for
the overall sample). They also indicate the total number (N) of
respondents reporting any wage for each respective job-pay type
and the number (n) who pay at a single rate (lowest=highest) for
a given job. The standard deviation (sd) is of the midpoint between
each respondent’s lowest and highest wage rates for the job.
The smaller the standard deviation, the closer that wages paid for
the job by all responding firms tend to cluster around their average.
Since 2006 the survey has included questions about hiring FLCs
and other contract firms for production services. In each table
of wage results, statistics on wage rates for general laborers employed
by these contractors are distinguished from those referring to direct
employees. Below the wages table are two statistics indicating the
extent of FLC use within a class of respondents: (1) the percentage
of respondent firms that hire any contractors, and (2) the average
share of their total labor expense that they pay for contracted
work.
Benefits Section
The survey form provides check-boxes only for indicating “yes”
to the question of whether employees receive each respective benefit.
The “% providing” result on these reports is calculated
as the number of respondents checking that box divided by the number
of all (N) within the crop, region, or size group specified in the
report title. Because this method treats all respondents who did
not check a given benefit box the same, whether they would have
checked a "no" box or would have simply left no entry
for the item, it may understate the share of those who actually
provide each benefit.
We hope you find these reports helpful and would welcome any suggestions
to improve the survey.
L. George Daniels, III
Executive Vice President
Farm Employers Labor Service (FELSŪ)
Phone: (800) 753-9073 - Fax (916) 561-5696
www.fels.org - gdaniels@fels.org |
Howard Rosenberg
Cooperative Extension Specialist
University of California
Phone: (510) 642-7103
howardr@are.berkeley.edu |
|